Why Don’t They Trust Me?

You’ve probably heard the phrase “trust takes years to build and seconds to break.” In the workplace—especially in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) work—that couldn’t be more accurate.

Trust is the glue that holds leadership credibility together. Without it, even the most well-written strategies and heartfelt commitments risk being seen as hollow words. And here’s the kicker: trust isn’t just about what leaders say—it’s about what they do, repeatedly, over time.

In this post, based on the latest What’s the DEIL? episode, we’re unpacking the role of trust in leadership, the dangers of a perception gap between leaders and employees, and how to intentionally build trusted spaces that last.

 

The Leadership Confidence Gap

During assessments with over 30 senior leaders representing organizations totaling more than 15,000 employees, one statistic jumped out:

Seventy-five percent of those leaders expressed concern about whether their organizations could actually deliver on their DEI commitments.

This wasn’t employees doubting leadership—it was leaders doubting themselves. That lack of internal confidence inevitably trickles down, shaping how teams perceive the organization’s ability to change.

It’s not just about confidence either. In the same group, 90% of leaders didn’t see themselves as active participants in core processes like recruiting, defaulting to HR to “bring them the right candidates.” That mindset signals a disconnect between leadership roles and the hands-on work DEI requires.

When Leaders and Employees See Different Realities

The nonprofit Just Capital found a 20% gap between how leaders and employees perceive their organization’s commitment to DEI. While 94% of leaders believed their company was committed, only 74% of employees agreed.

That gap matters. It represents more than a difference of opinion—it’s a measure of trust. Employees base their views on lived experience: how leaders show up, make decisions, and enforce accountability. Leaders often judge commitment based on stated intentions and policy language.

Bridging that gap requires aligning what’s on paper with what happens in practice.

Why “Safe Spaces” Aren’t the Goal

Many organizations talk about creating “safe spaces,” but here’s the reality: you can’t guarantee what feels safe for another person. People’s sense of safety is shaped by personal history, identity, and lived experiences.

Instead, focus on creating trusted spaces—environments where employees believe they can speak honestly, take interpersonal risks, and know they’ll be treated fairly. Unlike safety, trust is something leaders can actively influence through consistent behavior, transparent communication, and follow-through.

 

The Four Elements of Trust

According to the dictionary, trust is a firm belief in someone’s reliability, truth, ability, or strength. Let’s break that down for leaders:

  1. Reliability – Do you consistently follow through on commitments, even in small ways?

  2. Truth – Are you transparent, even when the news isn’t good?

  3. Ability – Do you have (or bring in) the expertise needed to deliver on your promises?

  4. Strength – Will you show courage when making difficult decisions or addressing hard truths?

Trust is measurable through these actions. If any element is missing, it’s noticeable.

Trust-Building Is a Practice, Not an Event

Trust can’t be built in a single meeting, an offsite retreat, or a one-time listening session. Just like physical fitness, it’s developed through consistent effort.

That means:

  • Investing time in genuine conversations, not just transactional check-ins

  • Sharing appropriate personal details so people see you as human, not just a title

  • Looking for common ground to foster connection

  • Engaging regularly, not only when problems arise

When leaders make time to know their people, they’re more likely to spot early warning signs of disengagement or brewing conflict.

Practical Ways to Build Trusted Spaces

Here are actionable steps leaders can take:

  • Start small conversations: Ask team members to share one word describing their week. It’s simple, but it opens the door to deeper discussion.

  • Be consistent: Don’t greet only the people nearest to your desk or in your inner circle. Make an effort to connect with everyone.

  • Balance sharing: Be authentic without oversharing. Give enough of yourself to create relatability without blurring professional boundaries.

  • Embed trust in goals: Make relationship-building an intentional part of your performance objectives.

Remember: the goal isn’t to become best friends with every employee—it’s to create conditions where people believe they can be candid with you without fear of repercussion.

The Cost of Neglecting Trust

When leaders neglect trust-building, they leave room for misunderstandings, perceived favoritism, and disengagement to fester. Over time, those conditions can lead to higher turnover, more complaints, and a weaker culture overall.

Conversely, leaders who make trust a daily practice build credibility that makes it easier to navigate tough conversations, implement change, and retain top talent.

Closing the Gap

Trust isn’t just a “soft skill”—it’s a strategic asset. It drives performance, strengthens culture, and supports every DEI initiative you implement. The most effective leaders don’t assume trust; they earn it.

By acting with reliability, telling the truth, demonstrating ability, and showing strength, you can turn the abstract idea of trust into a tangible part of your leadership legacy.

If your DEI strategy isn’t delivering, start by asking yourself: Do my people trust me to lead it?

Connect With Us

If you found this discussion compelling, we invite you to connect with us further. Here are some ways to stay in touch:

In many organizations, bias, favoritism, and discrimination are often addressed only after they become formal complaints, once someone files an HR report, contacts legal, or signals a red flag that leadership can no longer ignore. But by then, the damage has often already been done.

Disengagement. Attrition. A TikTok rant that goes viral.

These issues rarely arise in a vacuum. Instead, they’re the result of patterns—subtle, systemic inequities that manifest long before anyone says the word “investigation.”

So here’s the question forward-thinking employers should ask: Can you spot the pattern before it becomes a complaint?

This post explores how unchecked bias and favoritism show up in everyday team dynamics, why early detection matters, and how leaders can interrupt these behaviors before they escalate into reputational, legal, or cultural risks. It builds on the insights shared in Beyond the Complaint: A Culture-First Approach to Workplace Investigations and offers practical steps for moving from reactive investigation to proactive prevention.

The Quiet Cost of Invisible Patterns

Bias doesn’t always scream discrimination. More often, it whispers.

It’s the high-performing employee who keeps getting passed over for leadership projects.

The parent whose flexible work schedule becomes a silent strike against them during performance reviews.

The LGBTQ+ team member who’s consistently excluded from informal networking lunches.

Each moment, on its own, may seem explainable—or worse, insignificant. But together, they form a mosaic of exclusion. Over time, those affected stop speaking up. Or they leave. Or they post about it on social media.

And the organization is left wondering, Why didn’t we see this coming?

Download “Beyond the Complaint” and learn more about how to develop a culture-first approach to workplace investigations.

Bias vs. Favoritism vs. Discrimination: What’s the Difference?

Understanding the distinctions between these concepts is key to spotting them early:

Bias is often unconscious. It’s a cognitive shortcut that affects how we interpret behavior, assign competence, or evaluate performance. Everyone has biases—but unchecked, they shape inequitable outcomes.

Favoritism is about unequal treatment. It may not be tied to a protected class, but it still erodes morale and trust. Favoritism creates in-groups and out-groups, often based on personal relationships rather than performance.

Discrimination involves adverse action based on a legally protected characteristic (like race, gender, age, disability, or religion). It’s illegal—and often easier to prove when there’s a documented pattern.

The problem? All three of these can show up long before legal thresholds are crossed.

The Investigations That Never Got Filed

At The Norfus Firm, we’ve led internal investigations across countless industries and a recurring insight is this: Most of the issues that end up in formal investigations started months (or years) earlier, in small patterns that no one interrupted.

Here are just a few real-world examples:

  • A marketing team where white women consistently received feedback on “executive presence,” while their Black colleagues were told to work on “tone.”
  • An engineering department where all the stretch assignments and promotions went to team members who regularly attended after-hours social events—events that parents, caregivers, or introverts often skipped.
  • A company where LGBTQ+ staff were informally advised not to “be too political,” creating a culture of silence and suppression.

None of these examples began with a complaint. But in each case, they led to one.

Why Managers Are the First Line of Defense

Managers have the most day-to-day visibility into employee experience but without proper training, they can unknowingly reinforce harmful patterns. That’s why leadership development must go beyond skills and span into equity-based accountability.

Here’s how bias and favoritism typically manifest at the managerial level:

Unequal Access to Stretch Assignments

Managers often give high-visibility work to employees they “trust”—which can quickly become a proxy for sameness, comfort, or likability. This creates a self-fulfilling cycle: certain team members get opportunities, grow faster, and are seen as more valuable… while others stagnate, regardless of their potential.

Prevention Tip: Require managers to track who receives key projects. Quarterly reviews can surface patterns in opportunity distribution.

Subjective Performance Feedback

Bias thrives in ambiguity. Phrases like “not a culture fit,” “too aggressive,” or “lacks leadership presence” are subjective and often steeped in racial, gender, or age-related bias.

Prevention Tip: Standardize performance criteria and require concrete examples in feedback. Train managers on coded language and how to spot it in their evaluations.

Disproportionate Disciplinary Action

Employees from underrepresented backgrounds often face harsher discipline for similar behavior. This may be rooted in confirmation bias—interpreting actions as more problematic depending on who commits them.

Prevention Tip: Conduct a quarterly equity audit of disciplinary actions and performance improvement plans. Look for patterns across race, gender, and department.

What the Data Can Tell You (If You’re Looking)

Our culture-first investigation approach always includes a data-forward lens. Why? Because patterns tell the truth, even when people don’t feel safe enough to.

Here are the top data points we advise clients to regularly review:

  • Exit interview trends – Are certain demographics leaving at higher rates? What themes emerge?
  • Engagement surveys – Do perceptions of fairness, inclusion, or trust vary by identity group?
  • Promotion rates – Who’s moving up? Who isn’t? Why?
  • Performance ratings – Are they evenly distributed across demographics, or clustered?

Pro Tip: Don’t just look at averages. Disaggregate your data to uncover disparities.

How to Move from Investigation to Prevention

The most effective way to reduce complaints isn’t just about better investigations, it’s about reducing the conditions that create them in the first place. This requires leadership development, policy alignment, and cultural fluency.

Start with Manager Training

Train managers not just on what not to do, but on how to lead inclusively and recognize early signs of inequity. This includes:

  • Understanding how bias shows up in everyday decisions
  • Recognizing the impact of microaggressions
  • Creating psychological safety in team meetings
  • Disrupting favoritism and cliques

Create Accountability Loops

It’s not enough to train. There must be systems to enforce equitable behavior.

  • Include equity measures in manager KPIs
  • Implement 360-degree reviews with inclusion metrics
  • Track patterns in raises, recognition, and retention

Invest in Internal Audits and Culture Assessments

The Norfus Firm often supports organizations with internal culture diagnostics—uncovering risks before they become complaints. This work helps organizations build trust, improve retention, and develop ethical, values-aligned leaders.

When to Investigate, and When to Intervene

Let’s be clear: not every instance of bias or favoritism requires a formal investigation. But here’s when it does:

  • There are multiple similar complaints across departments
  • The concerns involve a senior leader or power imbalance
  • There’s evidence of retaliation or discrimination based on protected characteristics
  • There’s a breakdown of trust or fear of speaking up

In these cases, a trauma-informed, culturally aware investigation can protect your people and your brand. And when handled well, it’s not just about resolution, it’s about insight.

The Norfus Firm Approach: Culture-First, Legally Sound

At The Norfus Firm, we believe investigations are more than procedural necessities—they’re inflection points.

That’s why our model blends legal rigor and defensibility, culturally fluent analysis, trauma-informed interviews, and strategic follow-up and leadership coaching. We help our clients shift from reacting to complaints to preventing them—through smarter systems, more inclusive leadership, and actionable cultural insights.

Because the truth is: Bias, favoritism, and discrimination don’t always show up in complaints. But they always show up in your culture.

Download the Full Guide: “Beyond the Complaint”

If you’re ready to strengthen your internal investigation processes, empower your leaders, and build a healthier workplace culture, don’t wait for the next complaint. Download our guide: Beyond the Complaint: A Culture-First Approach to Workplace Investigations here

And if you’d like support conducting an investigation or building a preventative strategy, book a consultation with our team. Together, let’s move from silence to strategy and from risk to resilience. To do this:

  1. Schedule a consultation with our team today.
  2. Check out our podcast, What’s the DEIL? on Apple or YouTube
  3. Follow Natalie Norfus on LinkedIn and Shanté Gordon on LinkedIn for more insights.

Share this post on :

HOW WE HELP

Beyond the Report:
A Culture-First Approach to
Workplace Investigations

The Hidden DEI Gap: Leaders Who Don’t
Lead

A podcast that supports best practices in inclusive leadership

Helping you navigate workplace culture in a rapidly
evolving world.

Elevate Your People Strategy Today

Empower your organization with tailored HR and DEI solutions backed by 20 years of experience. Let’s build trusted spaces, strengthen accountability, and create meaningful, measurable progress—together.